Home » PC » Get that heart pumping external HR monitors for iPhone and Apple Watch

Get that heart pumping external HR monitors for iPhone and Apple Watch

The Apple Watch has an excellent oximeter-based heart rate monitor for tracking your day and basic workouts, but it’s not perfect for more endurance or weight-based activities. For those tough workouts, you should consider an external heart rate monitor like Scosche’s Rhythm+ Monitor Armband.

Best for Most: Scosche Rhythm+ monitor armband

The water-resistant (IP67) device connects to an adjustable neoprene strap. While you can wear it anywhere on your arm, Scosche recommends the forearm. (I did my initial tests with it in that location, as well.) It uses an 8-hour rechargeable battery, so you can plug it in after workouts as you might with an Apple Watch.

Both the small grey tracker and strap are slim and stylish, given that you’ll likely be wearing them in a visible location on your arm. You can slip a shirt on over the Rhythm+ if you want to hide it, but it’s a nice enough looking tracker to leave it visible. It does look a little goofy when both the Apple Watch and tracker are on the same arm, but until we have magical nanobot implants, such is our connected device lifestyle.

In practice, it’s significantly more comfortable than wearing a chest strap during heavy-duty workouts, while being about as accurate. The Rhythm+ uses green and yellow oximeter sensors (described as “PerformTek biometric sensor technology”) to get a more precise look at your heart rate than the Apple Watch’s green sensors alone and records data much more frequently.

I wore the Rhythm+ for a week to my regular skating practices and weight training sessions. From those workouts, it proved significantly more accurate than my usual Apple Watch tracking (I used Bluetooth to connect to the Rhythm, but it also offers ANT+ support for cyclists). My only concern with the Rhythm+ was occasional tightness when doing arm-related exercises. Although the neoprene strap flexes slightly, it’s not really designed to deal with major forearm or bicep flexion.

Unlike many of the other chest strap options, Scosche doesn’t offer a dedicated app for viewing your recorded heart rate data. Instead, you can look at it in Apple’s Activity or Health apps, or download a third-party option like Cardiogram.

Pros:

  • Lightweight
  • Breathable band
  • Frequent heart rate readings
  • Water-resistant

Cons:

  • Tight fit when lifting weights

Best for Most

Scosche Rhythm+ monitor armband

An armband that monitors without fear of battery drain.

If you’re looking to get better heart monitoring without going full in on the chest strap, get this forearm-monitoring instead.

Best for Runners: Wahoo TICKR X heart rate monitor

The biggest difference between the TICKR X and the Polar H10 is in these little additional options, largely for runners: The TICKR lets you track your stride, ground contact time, and vertical oscillation. It’s also less water-resistant, offering protection up to 5 feet versus the Polar’s 30.

In my tests, I found the TICKR X slightly less reliable than the Polar H10, largely thanks to its RunFit app, which occasionally caused the TICKR to malfunction. There were several instances during a workout where it claimed my heart rate was up in the 170s (it was not). I also noticed occasional misfires on account of the vertical oscillation tracker — during Wahoo’s 7 Minute Workout, it refused to log multiple exercises and reps on account of not seeing the movement.

That said, the TICKR X does have a friendlier look to both the workout app and overall experience; it markets itself as a Bluetooth chest strap for beginners, rather than Polar’s fitness experts.

Pros:

  • Water-resistant
  • Stride tracking
  • Vertical oscillation tracking
  • Offline support

Cons:

  • Inconsistent readings

Best for Runners

Wahoo TICKR X heart rate monitor

$80 at Wahoo

If you’re a runner, you’ll love the data analysis.

This electrode-based chest strap offers up to 16 hours of offline tracking, water resistance, an app for tracking your workouts.

Best for Apple Watch: ActionSleeve

It’s a band that you pop the case of your Apple Watch into and strap it to your upper arm. This keeps the Watch’s sensor securely to your skin, so you get a more consistent reading, especially if you’re bending your wrist a lot while you exercise.

Your Apple Watch, sans band, fits into a mount with the backside exposed, so the Watch’s sensors are unobstructed. The mount has a raised silicone border to protect the Watch from scratches (and keep it in place).

If you’re happy with the performance of your Apple Watch’s heart rate sensor, but don’t want it wrapped around your wrist while you work out, get the ActionSleeve. It’s the perfect alternative.

Pros:

  • Works with Apple Watch
  • More accurate readings thanks to positioning
  • Affordable

Cons:

  • Uncomfortable for bicep workouts

Best for Apple Watch

ActionSleeve

$20 at TwelveSouth

Lets you use your Apple Watch.

If you want to stick with the Apple Watch’s heart rate monitor, but want a little more accuracy, the ActionSleeve is perfect.

Best for Accuracy: Polar H10 Heart Rate Monitor

The H10 connects to your iPhone or Apple Watch using Bluetooth LE, though you’ll want to use one of Polar’s apps to get Polar’s specific readings. I used Polar Beat; it’s not my favorite app (and requires an in-app purchase if you want to see your heart rate/fat burn breakdown), but it does the trick. Your heart tracking will also log in to Apple’s Health app after you connect it, allowing you to take your fitness data elsewhere. And if you’re not near a connected device, the H10 has a small amount of onboard storage, allowing you to log a workout even without your devices present.

Note: We’ve seen several users run into an issue where the H10 appears on the iPhone, but not the Apple Watch. To fix this, you’ll want to pair the H10 to the Apple Watch first, before connecting it to your iPhone — or disable Bluetooth on your iPhone from the Settings app before attempting to pair with Apple Watch.

Polar’s H10 was by far the most accurate of the fitness trackers I tried, but it does come at the expense of having to wear a chest strap. During a run or weight training session, this shouldn’t bother you, but full-contact sports might be a bit much: For me, anything strapped to my chest in derby is a potential bruising hazard — and I’ve seen enough cracked sternums to want to avoid that fate at all costs.

Pros:

  • Accurate readings
  • Syncs with Health app
  • Onboard storage

Cons:

  • Chest strap style
  • Bad app design

Best for Accuracy

Polar H10 Heart Rate Monitor

From $76 at Amazon

Polar’s technology provides speedy fitness tracking.

This water-resistant chest strap is comfortable and offers electrode-based heart monitoring, so it’s more accurate than others.

Best for Long Runs: Scosche Rhythm24

The Rhythm24 has a battery status indicator, so you’ll know if it’s time to recharge.

It has seven different monitor modes for different training options. Set it for running, cycling, swimming, just tracking your heart rate, or heart rate variability for identifying stress and recovery during training. If you’re training for a duathlon or triathlon, set one of the multi-modes, and it will track each of your different activities.

You can record your workout and save your training data to help you better understand where you need improvement.

Just like the Rhythm+, it uses both yellow and green optical sensors for better accuracy with all skin tones.

I tested the Rhythm24 with daily running sessions alongside my Apple Watch. I found that the Rhythm24 was always more accurate, monitoring every heartbeat in real-time, as opposed to updating with new information that was already behind by the time it synced.

The Rhythm24 uses the same type of armband used with the Rhythm+. I found it to be very comfortable during my runs, but have not tried it with weight training exercises.

For just a bit more than the Rhythm+, the battery life, and multiple training modes make this a much better fit with fitness fans that workout for more than just an hour or two. If you’re a long-distance runner, a triathlon trainer, or just want to track your heart rate all day long, get the Rhythm24.

Pros:

  • Water-resistant
  • Longest battery life
  • Multiple workout modes
  • Support for triathlon training

Cons:

  • Expensive

Best for Long Runs

Scosche Rhythm24

$100 at Amazon

Great for fitness buffs that are in it for the long haul.

This heart rate monitor armband has 13 hours of continuous memory storage, so leave your phone behind when you’re training.

Best for Training: Dash Bluetooth Heart Rate Monitor Chest Strap & Health Sensor

With the Dash Bluetooth Heart Rate Monitor, you get real-time analysis of your heart rate and the number of calories that are burned during your workout sessions. This sensor will even work with your favorite compatible app, including Wahoo RunFit, Polar Beat, Endomondo, Runtastic, Sports Tracker, MapMyRide, and more.

The Dash Bluetooth Heart Rate Monitor helps you train smarter, not harder. It’s almost like having a pro with you, because the sensor helps you determine when to push your heart rate zone harder, but also lets you know when you should back off. With Dash, you’ll see results faster and prevent overtraining and injury.

As far as appearances go, the Dash Bluetooth Heart Rate Monitor is a sensor that attaches to an elastic strap, and the strap itself is easy to wear with the clip. The strap is designed for all body types, and it won’t get loose during training sessions. While the sensor is not rechargeable, it simply uses one of those flat batteries that can be replaced when it is out of juice. But the battery life lasts a long time, so you won’t need to worry about it for a while.

Pros:

  • Long battery life
  • Highly affordable
  • Compatible with many apps
  • Comfortable to wear
  • Helps you know your limits

Cons:

  • No rechargeable battery

Best for Training

Dash Bluetooth Heart Rate Monitor Chest Strap & Health Sensor

$40 at Amazon

Know your own limits

This sensor is simple, comfortable, and has long battery life. It works with many apps and helps you understand your limits.

Best for Cyclists: Wahoo TICKR FIT Heart Rate Monitor Armband

If you want to have the heart rate monitor that champions like Team INEOS, Bora-Hansgrohe, Katusha Alpecin, Ironman World Champion Jan Frodeno, Heather Jackson, and American Pro Mountain Biker Sonya Looney, then check out the Wahoo TICKR FIT.

The TICKR FIT is an armband that works best on your forearm, and you can get personalized heart rate training for more efficient workouts. With TICKR FIT, you’ll track and capture your heart rate in real-time, see your training zones and calories burned on your iPhone through over 50 compatible apps since it utilizes Bluetooth/ANT+. This means it will work with not only your iPhone, but tablets, GPS watches, and bike computers by Wahoo, Polar, Garmin, Apple, and many more.

If you use the Wahoo Fitness app with the TICKR FIT, you can automatically upload that data into your preferred training platform of choice, like Strava. And while it seems geared more for cycling, the TICKR FIT actually works well with any form of exercise. The TICKR FIT is quite accurate, comfortable, and stays in place as you exercise.

Pros:

  • Comfortable on forearm
  • Accurate readings
  • Works with over 50 apps and many devices
  • Up to 30 hours of battery life
  • Affordable price tag

Cons:

  • No data stored on device itself

Best for Cyclists

Wahoo TICKR FIT Heart Rate Monitor Armband

$80 at Amazon $80 at Best Buy

Champion cyclists use this heart rate monitor

TICKR FIT is comfortable and secure. It works with over 50 apps and connects to most devices for a personalized experience.

Why bother with an external heart rate monitor?

Heart rate monitoring on Apple Watch comes at the expense of battery life: The smartwatch’s health sensors account for a large majority of battery drain. As such, Apple limits how often the sensor records data, even during workouts. At rest, you’ll get heart rate data every 10 minutes; during a workout, you’re likely to get recordings every 10 seconds to a minute.

The wrist-based monitor can also get tripped up if you tend to do a lot of exercises involving wrist bending or quick movement. The oximeter works by measuring the movement of your blood using light. When you flex your wrist, you can momentarily change that circulation, leading to erroneous heart readings (If you’ve ever seen an Apple Watch reading of “65bpm” or lower or a grey number when you’re in the middle of a high-intensity workout, that’s likely what has happened).

If you’re worried about your Apple Watch’s battery life during a lengthy workout (like a marathon, for instance), or you’d like more consistent and quick readings, consider an external heart rate monitor. These Bluetooth accessories often run off quick charges or watch batteries and offer faster readings from a location with better circulation (like the chest or upper arm). If you don’t have an Apple Watch at all, you can use external monitors with your iPhone to get valuable heart rate data.

We’ve tested several of these Bluetooth heart rate monitors to give you the best recommendation.

Bottom line

The Scosche Rhythm+ monitor armband is a reliable, accurate, and affordable monitor that’s perfect for amateurs and fitness fanatics alike. Not only that, but it’s also an eye-catching accessory that’s bound to turn heads while you work up a sweat.

Plus, its significantly more comfortable than wearing a chest strap during heavy-duty workouts, while being about as accurate. The Rhythm+ uses green and yellow oximeter sensors (described as “PerformTek biometric sensor technology”) to get a more precise look at your heart rate than the Apple Watch’s green sensors alone and records data much more frequently.

Credits — The team that worked on this guide

Lory Gil is the current Managing Editor at iMore and has picked up the fitness mantel in Serenity’s absence. She’s been testing heart rate monitors on her daily morning jogs to make sure they meet our highest standards.

Christine Romero-Chan is a Staff Writer at iMore who is trying her best to get back into a more active lifestyle. She has been testing out new devices and tools that will help get her back on track.

Serenity Caldwell was formerly the Managing Editor at iMore, and now works for Apple. She spent a year testing these heart rate monitors while working out, training for roller derby, and testing her body’s limits.

Source of the article – iMore